Politweet.Org

Observing Malaysian Social Media

Posts Tagged ‘PTPTN

Sentiment Analysis on Selangor Menteri Besar Crisis

tski_opinion_sentiment_analysis2

We performed opinion-based sentiment analysis on 2,062 users who tweeted about the Selangor Menteri Besar crisis from August 9th – August 15th 2014. These users were randomly selected based on tweets we collected since the crisis began. Spammers, news agencies and accounts with automated tweets were not included in the sample.

Our goal initially was to gauge public opinion primarily on whether to keep or remove Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim. However mixed opinions emerged that allowed us to gauge responses to other parties involved e.g. Pakatan Rakyat (PR), Wan Azizah and Anwar Ibrahim. We were also able to gauge support for the State Assembly to be dissolved and state elections called.

Read the rest of this entry »

Advertisements

Stats on #DebatPTPTN

#DebatPTPTN was a debate on the PTPTN student loan scheme between @RafiziRamli (PKR) and @KhairyKJ (UMNO). It was organised by @SinarOnline. Statistics shown are from 9pm – 3am.

A total of 6,693 users wrote 17,611 tweets about the event. It peaked between 11pm-12am, with 7,513 mentions by 3,788 users. In total, @KhairyKJ was mentioned 6,569 times by 3,241 users and @RafiziRamli was mentioned 4,013 times by 1,936 users.

Interest can be roughly gauged by dividing mentions by users. @RafiziRamli had a slightly higher level of interest compared to @KhairyKJ, and gained 1,555 followers. @KhairyKJ gained 1,029 followers.Sentiment is hard to gauge due to supporters from both sides giving biased reporting. A brief survey of the tweets showed that:1. Users accused both debaters of being too focused on politics and accusations, and going off-topic
2. People were more focused on Khairy and Rafizi’s ability to answer questions rather than the answers themselves
3. There was not much discussion or comments on the ideas being discussed

Twitter Trends

‘PTPTN’ trended at 6th place at 11pm for 10 minutes.

In KL, ‘Rafizi’ trended at 6th place at 11.40pm, until reaching 3rd place at 2am. Rafizi continued to trend until 8.30am, by which time he had dropped to 4th place.

In Malaysia, ‘Rafizi’ trended at 10th place at 11pm, reaching 2nd place at 1.40am. He stopped trending at 8.30am, ending at 3rd place.

No other Malaysian or KL trends were relevant to this debate.

Written by politweet

May 23, 2012 at 4:08 am

Sentiment Analysis on the Abolish PTPTN movement

Sentiment analysis was conducted on 31,639 tweets by 5,627 users regarding the abolish PTPTN movement (#mansuhPTPTN) from 5th – 21st April 2012. The majority of those who opposed abolishment cited the ethical issue of borrowing money and not repaying. An estimated 280 users (5% of total) who did not support the cause, were willing to support reducing or writing-off the interest.

Sentiment (users)

Support: 723 (12.85%)
No Opinion: 1,000 (17.78%)
Oppose: 3,904 (69.3%)

Reasons for supporting

  1. Most gave no reason for their support, other than ‘Why not?’
  2. If the govt can afford PKFZ, NFC scandal, it can afford this
  3. High cost of living makes repayment difficult
  4. PKR/PR supporters
  5. Anti-UMNO/Anti-BN sentiment
  6. Problems with converting the loan to scholarship; blacklisting too harsh; interest rate too high
Reasons for opposing

  1. Taking a loan carries the moral obligation to repay it
  2. There is a sense of pride in taking a loan and working to settle it. Write-off insults those who worked hard.
  3. The loan is converted to a scholarship for students who get good grades. Free education must be earned.
  4. Taxpayers will have to pay for it, and taxes may increase in future to support free education
  5. Why PTPTN and not other education loans too?
  6. It does not solve the problem of lack of skills,job opportunities and poor grades
  7. Poor competition if education is free.
  8. Taxpayers should not carry the burden of student living allowance, which makes up 50-80% of the loan
  9. Living allowance is spent on personal luxuries such as gadgets, motorbike,etc.
  10. Low interest rate and long repayment period is a good deal
  11. Country is not rich enough to support free education
  12. PTPTN is currently being abused as it can be taken together with other loans
  13. Bad behaviour by students – using the grave marker (batu nisan), funeral wreath on Najib Razak and Khaled Nordin’s photo was very offensive. Chants of ‘Reformasi’,’Najib-Altantuya’ and ‘Musnah Rosmah’ were seen as political and irrelevant to the cause
  14. Small number of student activists at Dataran Merdeka show their movement does not represent the majority
  15. PTPTN should be restructured instead of abolished, perhaps with alternate payment plans or change in interest

Methodology for sentiment analysis

Because Malay tweets have alternate spellings for most words, a phrase-based approach (where phrases/tweets are assigned negative/positive values)was not practical. Instead, timelines for each user containing keywords related to PTPTN were read and analysed to determine a user’s stand on the issue.

This proved to be more accurate than an automated approach because quite often a user would change his/her opinion after learning more about the issue.

Users who were retweeting very strong opinions on the issue, while offering no opinion of their own, where considered to have that opinion.

In cases where a user would tweet/retweet conflicting opinion without making their own opinion clear, the user would be categorised as having ‘No opinion’. The same applies to users who opposed the issue because they thought it was about ending scholarships, or writing-off the loan for debtors.

Analysis

Users tweeting about PTPTN mostly tweeted in Malay (83.5% of tweets), and 46.3% are apolitical and do not follow politicians on Twitter. This implies that the opinions expressed are mostly by young Malays, most of whom are not interested in politics (at least on Twitter).

The initial negative feedback was due to the student activist’s focus on abolishment of PTPTN and writing-off the loan. Free education was not a widespread message even by the supporters. Some users misunderstood the issue to be an end to all scholarships, a misunderstanding that was played up by BN supporters. Users who had this misunderstanding were counted as having ‘No opinion’.

What was surprising was asking for a write-off was seen by the majority as insulting. Many users took this personally, and followed-up with an expression of pride in their ability to convert the loan due to good grades from hard work or getting a job and repaying. Some users stated that even if PTPTN were to be abolished, the loan should be repaid. Religious arguments were used as well, with expressions that demanding others to suffer (tax payers) for what you enjoyed (education) is a sin.

When supporters countered this by bringing up the govt. settlement of suits between GLCs and Tajuddin Ramli, this was not effective. Using one wrong to justify another wrong was not a good approach. The suggestion to repay the amount paid by those who settled their loans was also offensive.

It was as though the student activsts lost all credibility the moment they asked for their loan to be written-off. This potentially closed people’s minds to any future argument regarding free education or any payment plan that came after. As some users later remarked, they did not understand what the students were fighting for as free education and abolishment PTPTN were seen by many as separate issues.

The relatively small number of student activists involved in the #mansuhPTPTN march on Saturday, 14th April 2012 reflect the small number of supporters on Twitter.

When looking at the partisanship (stats to come in a future graph), 49% of opposers are apolitical, whereas 32% of supporters are apolitical. There is greater political influence on supporters from both PR and BN. Another interesting fact is that for users who exclusively follow PR politicians, 108 oppose and 107 support. Even among partisan PR supporters there is lack of agreement on this issue.

Based on the response in the real world and the Twitter, it can be said that the move to propose abolishing PTPTN was not popular. However writing off the interest or reducing it would win a lot of support from existing PTPTN debtors.

Ahmed Kamal
25th April 2012

Summary of data used
====================

Sentiment (users)

Support: 723 (12.85%)
No Opinion: 1,000 (17.78%)
Oppose: 3,904 (69.3%)

Following politicians (users)

Political: 3,024 (53.74%)
Apolitical: 2,603 (46.26%)

Language (tweets)

Malay: 26,422 (83.51%)
English: 5,198 (16.43%)
Chinese: 19 (0.06%)

Written by politweet

April 24, 2012 at 4:00 am